====== Differences ====== This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
bosu_neg [2015/01/23 18:07] anna |
bosu_neg [2015/01/23 18:28] (current) anna |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
full====== '14-'15 BoSu Negative ====== | full====== '14-'15 BoSu Negative ====== | ||
+ | =====GSU===== | ||
===== Gambling K ===== | ===== Gambling K ===== | ||
Line 163: | Line 164: | ||
We must develop a new adversarial aesthetics that . . . ethics beyond the specious enjoyment promised by Whiteness. | We must develop a new adversarial aesthetics that . . . ethics beyond the specious enjoyment promised by Whiteness. | ||
- | =====QUARTERS - CHOCOLATE LAXATIVES===== | + | =====Quarters - Chocolate Laxatives===== |
**LEGALIZATION OF MARIJUANA IS THE CHOCOLATE LAXATIVE—IT IS A LIBERAL VISION OF POLITICS THAT RESISTS THE HARD KERNEL OF THE REAL BY CREATING PLEASURES THAT CONTAIN THEIR OWN PRINCIPLE OF CONSTRAINT. THE IMPACT IS A JUSTICATION OF CAPITALISM, BIOPOLITICS AND COMPLICITY WITH THE WAR MACHINE**\\ | **LEGALIZATION OF MARIJUANA IS THE CHOCOLATE LAXATIVE—IT IS A LIBERAL VISION OF POLITICS THAT RESISTS THE HARD KERNEL OF THE REAL BY CREATING PLEASURES THAT CONTAIN THEIR OWN PRINCIPLE OF CONSTRAINT. THE IMPACT IS A JUSTICATION OF CAPITALISM, BIOPOLITICS AND COMPLICITY WITH THE WAR MACHINE**\\ | ||
**__ZIZEK ‘3__** (Slavoj, http://www.egs.edu/faculty/slavoj-zizek/articles/homo-sacer-as-the-object-of-the-university-discourse/) | **__ZIZEK ‘3__** (Slavoj, http://www.egs.edu/faculty/slavoj-zizek/articles/homo-sacer-as-the-object-of-the-university-discourse/) | ||
Line 183: | Line 184: | ||
Meta-transformation means that just as the . . . the human in a world of psychotechnological mystifications. | Meta-transformation means that just as the . . . the human in a world of psychotechnological mystifications. | ||
- | =====QUARTERS - CARTELS ADVANTAGE===== | + | =====Quarters - Cartels Advantage===== |
***THE AFFIRMATIVE’S DEPICTION OF MEXICO AS A PLACE OF NARCO-CHAOS AND UNREST CONTRIBUTES TO THE DOMINANT NARRATIVES OF THE DRUG WAR, LEGITIMATING IMPERIALIST INTERVENTION AND OBSCURING THAT THE ROOT CAUSE OF ALL THEIR IMPACTS IS US POLICY**\\ | ***THE AFFIRMATIVE’S DEPICTION OF MEXICO AS A PLACE OF NARCO-CHAOS AND UNREST CONTRIBUTES TO THE DOMINANT NARRATIVES OF THE DRUG WAR, LEGITIMATING IMPERIALIST INTERVENTION AND OBSCURING THAT THE ROOT CAUSE OF ALL THEIR IMPACTS IS US POLICY**\\ | ||
**__CARLOS 14__** (Alfredo, Q.A. Shaw McKean Jr. Fellow @ Rutgers U School of Management and Labor Relations and Doctoral Candidate in Political Science @ U California – Irvine, Mexico “Under Siege”: Drug Cartels or U.S. Imperialism?, Latin American Perspectives, Issue 195, Vol. 41 No. 2, March 2014, p. 43-59) | **__CARLOS 14__** (Alfredo, Q.A. Shaw McKean Jr. Fellow @ Rutgers U School of Management and Labor Relations and Doctoral Candidate in Political Science @ U California – Irvine, Mexico “Under Siege”: Drug Cartels or U.S. Imperialism?, Latin American Perspectives, Issue 195, Vol. 41 No. 2, March 2014, p. 43-59) | ||
Line 253: | Line 254: | ||
The further securitization of Africa does not follow . . . two authorized responses to otherness. (60) | The further securitization of Africa does not follow . . . two authorized responses to otherness. (60) | ||
- | =====QUARTERS - KEEDZ===== | + | =====Quarters - Keedz===== |
**KIDS WILL GET THE WEED ANYWAY**\\ | **KIDS WILL GET THE WEED ANYWAY**\\ | ||
Line 285: | Line 286: | ||
- | =====FINALS - POT K===== | + | =====Finals - Pot K===== |
**ON APRIL 17, 2010, DRUG LAWYER JENNIFER SOARES STOOD IN FRONT OF A CROWD IN CALIFORNIA AND ANNOUNCED THAT SHE OPPOSED LEGISLATION TO LEGALIZE MARIJUANA IN CALIFORNIA. AN AUDIENCE OF DRUG USERS, HIPPIES, AND INDUSTRY REPRESENTATIVES STARED BACK AT HER.**\\ | **ON APRIL 17, 2010, DRUG LAWYER JENNIFER SOARES STOOD IN FRONT OF A CROWD IN CALIFORNIA AND ANNOUNCED THAT SHE OPPOSED LEGISLATION TO LEGALIZE MARIJUANA IN CALIFORNIA. AN AUDIENCE OF DRUG USERS, HIPPIES, AND INDUSTRY REPRESENTATIVES STARED BACK AT HER.**\\ | ||
(From the East Bay Express, August . . . -legalization/Content?oid=2018142) | (From the East Bay Express, August . . . -legalization/Content?oid=2018142) | ||
Line 335: | Line 336: | ||
That is why for Zi2ek, Bataille is . . . subject in a repetitive cycle of ineffectual transgressions. | That is why for Zi2ek, Bataille is . . . subject in a repetitive cycle of ineffectual transgressions. | ||
- | =====FINALS - FRAMEWORK===== | + | =====Finals - Framework===== |
**THE PLAN IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE ALT—THE PURITY OF POLICY SOLUTIONS MOBILIZES ONE FASCISM AGAINST ANOTHER—YOU SHOULD REMEMBER THE LISTLESS AND LACK OF JOY WITH WHICH MILES INDICATES THAT THE ONLY REASON TO VOTE AFF IS THAT THEY’RE A LITTLE BIT BETTER AT DEBATE EVEN THOUGH THE AFF IS ABOUT A SYSTEMATIC GENOCIDE. THEY ARE THE MOST JOYLESS REVOLUTIONARIES I’VE EVER SEEN. WE NEED TO BURN A HOLE THROUGH THE WALL, BUT THAT MEANS WE NEED TO KEEP THE WALL**\\ | **THE PLAN IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE ALT—THE PURITY OF POLICY SOLUTIONS MOBILIZES ONE FASCISM AGAINST ANOTHER—YOU SHOULD REMEMBER THE LISTLESS AND LACK OF JOY WITH WHICH MILES INDICATES THAT THE ONLY REASON TO VOTE AFF IS THAT THEY’RE A LITTLE BIT BETTER AT DEBATE EVEN THOUGH THE AFF IS ABOUT A SYSTEMATIC GENOCIDE. THEY ARE THE MOST JOYLESS REVOLUTIONARIES I’VE EVER SEEN. WE NEED TO BURN A HOLE THROUGH THE WALL, BUT THAT MEANS WE NEED TO KEEP THE WALL**\\ | ||
**__LAND ‘92__** (Nick Land is a lecturer in Continental Philosophy at Warwick University, The Thirst for Annihilation: Georges Bataille and Virulent Nihilism, 140) | **__LAND ‘92__** (Nick Land is a lecturer in Continental Philosophy at Warwick University, The Thirst for Annihilation: Georges Bataille and Virulent Nihilism, 140) | ||
Line 348: | Line 349: | ||
In the educational theories of Illich, and . . . , any conception of revolutionary pedagogy is doomed. | In the educational theories of Illich, and . . . , any conception of revolutionary pedagogy is doomed. | ||
- | =====FINALS – OVERVIEW===== | + | =====Finals – Overview===== |
TRANSGRESSIONS REQUIRE THE LAW, BUT THEY ALSO CLEAR SPACE FOR ITS EVENTUAL ELIMINATION OF LAW | TRANSGRESSIONS REQUIRE THE LAW, BUT THEY ALSO CLEAR SPACE FOR ITS EVENTUAL ELIMINATION OF LAW | ||
**__DIREK ‘7__** (Zeynep, assoc prof of philosophy at Galatasaray Univ, Turkey, “Erotic experience and sexual difference in Bataille,” in Reading Bataille Now, ed. Shannon Winnubst) | **__DIREK ‘7__** (Zeynep, assoc prof of philosophy at Galatasaray Univ, Turkey, “Erotic experience and sexual difference in Bataille,” in Reading Bataille Now, ed. Shannon Winnubst) | ||
Line 357: | Line 358: | ||
As I noted above, the … everything outside this paranoid relationship. | As I noted above, the … everything outside this paranoid relationship. | ||
- | =====FINALS - A2 NO RACISM===== | + | =====Finals - A2 No Racism====== |
**ARGUMENTS FOR LEGALIZATION DON’T HAPPEN IN A VACUUM—THEY REFLECT THE DOMINANCE OF WHITENESS, AND THE POST LEGALIZATION REGIME WILL BE AS CONTROLLED BY RACE AND CAPITAL AS THE REGIME OF PROHIBITION. THERE’S NO SOLVENCY FOR THEIR AFF, AND ONLY OR CRITIQUE CAN SOLVE.**\\ | **ARGUMENTS FOR LEGALIZATION DON’T HAPPEN IN A VACUUM—THEY REFLECT THE DOMINANCE OF WHITENESS, AND THE POST LEGALIZATION REGIME WILL BE AS CONTROLLED BY RACE AND CAPITAL AS THE REGIME OF PROHIBITION. THERE’S NO SOLVENCY FOR THEIR AFF, AND ONLY OR CRITIQUE CAN SOLVE.**\\ | ||
**__ELLISON__**, Washing ton Correspondent, Philadelphia Tribune, 2014 (Charles, http://www.theroot.com/articles/politics/2014/01/legalized_marijuana_could_create_racially_segregated_users.html) | **__ELLISON__**, Washing ton Correspondent, Philadelphia Tribune, 2014 (Charles, http://www.theroot.com/articles/politics/2014/01/legalized_marijuana_could_create_racially_segregated_users.html) | ||
Line 367: | Line 368: | ||
- | ===== Finals - Must Do Something ===== | + | =====Finals - Must Do Something===== |
**THE LAW AGAINST MARIHUANA ENCOURAGES TRANSGRESSION OF LAW IN GENERAL - IT CONVEYS PROHIBITION WITHOUT AUTHORITY WHICH IS PRECISELY WHAT OUR LINK EVIDENCE IS ABOUT**\\ | **THE LAW AGAINST MARIHUANA ENCOURAGES TRANSGRESSION OF LAW IN GENERAL - IT CONVEYS PROHIBITION WITHOUT AUTHORITY WHICH IS PRECISELY WHAT OUR LINK EVIDENCE IS ABOUT**\\ | ||
Line 374: | Line 375: | ||
- | =====FINALS - PERM===== | + | =====Finals - Perm===== |
**TRANSGRESSION NEEDS THE LAW—COMBINING TRANSGRESSION WITH A REFUSAL OF THE LAW RESULTS IN UNLIMITED VIOLENCE**\\ | **TRANSGRESSION NEEDS THE LAW—COMBINING TRANSGRESSION WITH A REFUSAL OF THE LAW RESULTS IN UNLIMITED VIOLENCE**\\ | ||
**__FOLEY ET AL 2012__** (Matt Foley, Neil McRobert and Aspasia Stephanou, “Introduction: the limits of transgression and the subject,” in Transgression and its limits) | **__FOLEY ET AL 2012__** (Matt Foley, Neil McRobert and Aspasia Stephanou, “Introduction: the limits of transgression and the subject,” in Transgression and its limits) | ||
Line 389: | Line 390: | ||
- | =====FINALS – ABBAS K===== | + | =====Finals – Abbas K===== |
**THE AFF IS A SENTIMENTAL POLITICS WHICH PROMISES THAT EMPATHETIC IDENTIFICATION WITH VICTIMS OF THE WAR ON DRUGS WILL RESHAPE THE WORLD AND ACTUALIZE AN ETHICS OF CARE. THE AFF IMAGINES THAT BRINGING THE SUFFERING PRISONER’S BODY INTO THE DEBATE SPACE BECOMES A PROPHYLACTIC FROM OUR VIOLENCE TOWARD OTHERS AND STATE VIOLENCE TOWARD THOSE. **\\ | **THE AFF IS A SENTIMENTAL POLITICS WHICH PROMISES THAT EMPATHETIC IDENTIFICATION WITH VICTIMS OF THE WAR ON DRUGS WILL RESHAPE THE WORLD AND ACTUALIZE AN ETHICS OF CARE. THE AFF IMAGINES THAT BRINGING THE SUFFERING PRISONER’S BODY INTO THE DEBATE SPACE BECOMES A PROPHYLACTIC FROM OUR VIOLENCE TOWARD OTHERS AND STATE VIOLENCE TOWARD THOSE. **\\ | ||
**YOU’RE NOT IN THE MOVEMENT, A BALLOT WON’T HELP IT, AND THEY DON’T WANT YOU INVOLVED. THEIR POLITICIZATION OF THIS VIOLENCE RELIES ON A RACIST VICTIM ECONOMY IN WHICH BLACK, BROWN AND RED BODIES ARE VAMPIRICALLY DRAINED OF LIFE, MADE TO DANCE FOR A INFINITELY DEFERRED FREEDOM, ALL WHILE ACADEMICS EXTRACT JOUISSANCE AND ADVANCEMENT FROM THEIR OBJECTIFIED IDENTITIES. **\\ | **YOU’RE NOT IN THE MOVEMENT, A BALLOT WON’T HELP IT, AND THEY DON’T WANT YOU INVOLVED. THEIR POLITICIZATION OF THIS VIOLENCE RELIES ON A RACIST VICTIM ECONOMY IN WHICH BLACK, BROWN AND RED BODIES ARE VAMPIRICALLY DRAINED OF LIFE, MADE TO DANCE FOR A INFINITELY DEFERRED FREEDOM, ALL WHILE ACADEMICS EXTRACT JOUISSANCE AND ADVANCEMENT FROM THEIR OBJECTIFIED IDENTITIES. **\\ | ||
Line 406: | Line 407: | ||
In Martha Nussbaum’s celebration of … desire, hope, and life itself. | In Martha Nussbaum’s celebration of … desire, hope, and life itself. | ||
- | =====FINALS - CASE===== | + | =====Finals - Case===== |
THE PROLIFERATION OF MEANING AND CONSCIOUSNESS RAISING RELY ON A FANTASY OF COMMUNICATION WHICH IMLODES UNDER ITS OWN WIEGHT. MORE KNOWLEDGE DOES NOT CHANGE REALITY. | THE PROLIFERATION OF MEANING AND CONSCIOUSNESS RAISING RELY ON A FANTASY OF COMMUNICATION WHICH IMLODES UNDER ITS OWN WIEGHT. MORE KNOWLEDGE DOES NOT CHANGE REALITY. | ||
Line 416: | Line 417: | ||
What these parallels point … revolutionary pedagogy is doomed. | What these parallels point … revolutionary pedagogy is doomed. | ||
- | ===== KY ROUND 2 JASON’S FARM-FRESH PRODUCE K===== | + | =====Kentucky===== |
+ | ====Kentucky Round 2 Jason's Farm-Fresh Produce K==== | ||
**LEGALIZATION OF MARIJUANA IS THE CHOCOLATE LAXATIVE— A LIBERAL VISION OF POLITICS THAT RESISTS THE HARD KERNEL OF THE REAL BY CREATING PLEASURES THAT CONTAIN THEIR OWN PRINCIPLE OF CONSTRAINT. “YOU CAN GET YOUR WEED WITH YOUR PEACHES!” **\\ | **LEGALIZATION OF MARIJUANA IS THE CHOCOLATE LAXATIVE— A LIBERAL VISION OF POLITICS THAT RESISTS THE HARD KERNEL OF THE REAL BY CREATING PLEASURES THAT CONTAIN THEIR OWN PRINCIPLE OF CONSTRAINT. “YOU CAN GET YOUR WEED WITH YOUR PEACHES!” **\\ | ||
**__ŽIŽEK ‘3__** (Slavoj, http://www.egs.edu/faculty/slavoj-zizek/articles/homo-sacer-as-the-object-of-the-university-discourse/) | **__ŽIŽEK ‘3__** (Slavoj, http://www.egs.edu/faculty/slavoj-zizek/articles/homo-sacer-as-the-object-of-the-university-discourse/) | ||
Line 433: | Line 435: | ||
Why can the paradigm of representation not function . . . constitutive of reality and not of its representation. | Why can the paradigm of representation not function . . . constitutive of reality and not of its representation. | ||
- | ===== KY ROUND 2 CRETINOUS OEDIPUS K===== | + | ====Kentucky Round 2 Cretinous Oedipus K==== |
**YOUR EXTINCTION SCENARIOS ARE INEVITABLE**\\ | **YOUR EXTINCTION SCENARIOS ARE INEVITABLE**\\ | ||
**__FLUSSER ‘83__** (Vilém, Deceased Prof. of Media Studies and Philosophy @ U. of Sao Paulo, “Our Dread,” Post-History, pp. 125-127) | **__FLUSSER ‘83__** (Vilém, Deceased Prof. of Media Studies and Philosophy @ U. of Sao Paulo, “Our Dread,” Post-History, pp. 125-127) | ||
Line 441: | Line 443: | ||
**__FLUSSER ‘83__** (Vilém, Deceased Prof. of Media Studies and Philosophy @ U. of Sao Paulo, “Our Dread,” Post-History, pp. 128-130) | **__FLUSSER ‘83__** (Vilém, Deceased Prof. of Media Studies and Philosophy @ U. of Sao Paulo, “Our Dread,” Post-History, pp. 128-130) | ||
We cannot therefore engage with human intelligence against . . . . be anything more terrifying than a cretinous Oedipus? | We cannot therefore engage with human intelligence against . . . . be anything more terrifying than a cretinous Oedipus? | ||
- | ===== KY ROUND 2 SMALL FARMS===== | + | ====Kentucky Round 2 Small Farms==== |
**THEY ARE THE MCDONALDIZATION OF WEED. MICROBUD CULTIVATION IS INSIGNIFICANT IN THE FACE OF THE BONFIRE OF INDUSTRIALIZED PRODUCTION**\\ | **THEY ARE THE MCDONALDIZATION OF WEED. MICROBUD CULTIVATION IS INSIGNIFICANT IN THE FACE OF THE BONFIRE OF INDUSTRIALIZED PRODUCTION**\\ | ||
**__CRAWFORD ‘13__** (Seth S., Assoc. Prof. of Sociology @ Oregon State U., “The Political Economy of Medical Marijuana” pp. 144-151) | **__CRAWFORD ‘13__** (Seth S., Assoc. Prof. of Sociology @ Oregon State U., “The Political Economy of Medical Marijuana” pp. 144-151) | ||
Line 456: | Line 458: | ||
None of the foregoing will come as news . . . North/South consumption, and biophysical drawdown. | None of the foregoing will come as news . . . North/South consumption, and biophysical drawdown. | ||
- | ===== KY ROUND 2 FUMIGATION OR SOMETHING===== | + | ====Kentucky Round 2 Fumigation Or Something==== |
**THEY CANNOT WIN THIS ADVANTAGE INTERNAL LINK.**\\ | **THEY CANNOT WIN THIS ADVANTAGE INTERNAL LINK.**\\ | ||
**1) THEY HAVE BOXED AND BOLDED A PART OF THE ARTICLE SAYING THAT IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO STOP THE COLUMBIAN DRUG TRADE WITHOUT ENDING UNITED STATES DEMAND FOR THE DRUG. REGARDLESS OF WHAT INTERNATIONAL CREDIBILITY LEGALIZATION HAS – ALLOWING USE OF MARIJUANA IS TOTALLY UNRELATED TO THE FACT THAT WHITE PEOPLE LOVE THE SNOWMAN.**\\ | **1) THEY HAVE BOXED AND BOLDED A PART OF THE ARTICLE SAYING THAT IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO STOP THE COLUMBIAN DRUG TRADE WITHOUT ENDING UNITED STATES DEMAND FOR THE DRUG. REGARDLESS OF WHAT INTERNATIONAL CREDIBILITY LEGALIZATION HAS – ALLOWING USE OF MARIJUANA IS TOTALLY UNRELATED TO THE FACT THAT WHITE PEOPLE LOVE THE SNOWMAN.**\\ | ||
Line 493: | Line 495: | ||
The popularity of the low resilience assumption is . . . economic arguments to justify the conservation of biodiversity. | The popularity of the low resilience assumption is . . . economic arguments to justify the conservation of biodiversity. | ||
- | =====KY ROUND 3 DEATH K===== | + | ====Kentucky Round 3 Death K==== |
**THE AFF’S TURN TO DEATH IS NOT A RADICAL GESTURE; IT MERELY REINFORCES A WESTERN METAPHYSICS BOUND TO NECROPHILIA AND DEATH DEALING. THE AFF’S SYMBOLIC OBSESSION WITH DEATH NECESSARILY FORECLOSES A POLITICS OF NATALITY. INSTEAD OF ENGAGING IN A PROCESS OF CONTINUAL MORTIFICATION, WE MUST EMBRACE NATALITY, AN UNPREDICTABLE AND RADICAL AFFIRMATION OF LIFE THAT IS CAPABLE OF BREAKING FROM A HISTORY OF OBJECTIFICATION THAT MAKES ALL MASS AND MICRO VIOLENCE NECESSARY AND INEVITABLE.**\\ | **THE AFF’S TURN TO DEATH IS NOT A RADICAL GESTURE; IT MERELY REINFORCES A WESTERN METAPHYSICS BOUND TO NECROPHILIA AND DEATH DEALING. THE AFF’S SYMBOLIC OBSESSION WITH DEATH NECESSARILY FORECLOSES A POLITICS OF NATALITY. INSTEAD OF ENGAGING IN A PROCESS OF CONTINUAL MORTIFICATION, WE MUST EMBRACE NATALITY, AN UNPREDICTABLE AND RADICAL AFFIRMATION OF LIFE THAT IS CAPABLE OF BREAKING FROM A HISTORY OF OBJECTIFICATION THAT MAKES ALL MASS AND MICRO VIOLENCE NECESSARY AND INEVITABLE.**\\ | ||
**__JANTZEN ‘4 __**/Grace M. is Research Professor of Religion, Culture and Gender at the University of Manchester, Death and the Displacement of Beauty: Volume One: Foundations of Violence, London: Routledge, pg. 5-6/ | **__JANTZEN ‘4 __**/Grace M. is Research Professor of Religion, Culture and Gender at the University of Manchester, Death and the Displacement of Beauty: Volume One: Foundations of Violence, London: Routledge, pg. 5-6/ | ||
Line 509: | Line 511: | ||
**__WALTERS ‘9__** /Bryan, DPhil, is the Stead Professor of Christian Social Ethics, and Director of the Stead Center for Ethics and Values at Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminar, “REVITALIZING MEDICINE: EMPOWERING NATALITY VS. FEARING MORTALITY.” Ethics & Medicine: An International Journal Of Bioethics, 25(2), 83-94/ | **__WALTERS ‘9__** /Bryan, DPhil, is the Stead Professor of Christian Social Ethics, and Director of the Stead Center for Ethics and Values at Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminar, “REVITALIZING MEDICINE: EMPOWERING NATALITY VS. FEARING MORTALITY.” Ethics & Medicine: An International Journal Of Bioethics, 25(2), 83-94/ | ||
Arendt insists that if we fixate on death. . . metaphor for ordering our common life.'^ | Arendt insists that if we fixate on death. . . metaphor for ordering our common life.'^ | ||
- | =====KY ROUND 3 CASE===== | + | ====Kentucky Round 3 Case==== |
**DESIRE TO PROVIDE “MEANING” OR “CHOICE” FOR CONTEMPORARY DEATH BECOMES SIMPLY ANOTHER MARKET IN THE LIBERAL BEHEMOTH – CHOOSE YOUR OWN DEATHSTYLE. CELEBRATORY AFFIRMATIONS OF ACCESS TO PAS IGNORE THAT CONTEMPORARY SOVEREIGNTY STRUCTURES EVERYONE IN PERMANENT EXPOSURE TO DEATH, WHICH MEANS CRITICISM OF THAT STRUCTURE IS A PREREQUISITE TO PRODUCTIVE RELATION TO DEATH.**\\ | **DESIRE TO PROVIDE “MEANING” OR “CHOICE” FOR CONTEMPORARY DEATH BECOMES SIMPLY ANOTHER MARKET IN THE LIBERAL BEHEMOTH – CHOOSE YOUR OWN DEATHSTYLE. CELEBRATORY AFFIRMATIONS OF ACCESS TO PAS IGNORE THAT CONTEMPORARY SOVEREIGNTY STRUCTURES EVERYONE IN PERMANENT EXPOSURE TO DEATH, WHICH MEANS CRITICISM OF THAT STRUCTURE IS A PREREQUISITE TO PRODUCTIVE RELATION TO DEATH.**\\ | ||
**__NOYS ‘5__** (Benjamin, Reader in English at the University of Chichester, Culture of Death, pp. 51-52) | **__NOYS ‘5__** (Benjamin, Reader in English at the University of Chichester, Culture of Death, pp. 51-52) | ||
Line 908: | Line 910: | ||
Infrastructure funding is causing a bubble – spending cut would be good | Infrastructure funding is causing a bubble – spending cut would be good | ||
- | Flyvbjerg, 10 - Professor of Major Programme Management at Oxford University's Saïd Business School and is Founding Director of the University's BT Centre for Major Programme Management. He was previously Professor of Planning at Aalborg University, Denmark and Chair of Infrastructure Policy and Planning at Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands (Bent, “Survival of the unfittest: why the worst infrastructure gets built—and what we can do about it,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Volume 25, Number 3, 2009, pp.344–367, Oxford Journals Online)//DH | + | Flyvbjerg, 10 - Professor of Major Programme Management at Oxford University's Saïd Business School and is Founding Director of the University's BT Centre for Major Programme Management. He was previously Professor of Planning at Aalborg University, Denmark and Chair of Infrastructure Policy and Planning at Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands (Bent, “Survival of the unfittest: why the worst infrastructure gets built—and what we can do about it,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Volume 25, Number 3, 2009, pp.344–367, Oxford Journals Online) |
In the introduction to this article, … in 2009, moving into energy instead. | In the introduction to this article, … in 2009, moving into energy instead. | ||
Line 964: | Line 966: | ||
No India-Pakistan war – unwinnable for both sides and the costs of nuclear war are too high | No India-Pakistan war – unwinnable for both sides and the costs of nuclear war are too high | ||
- | Chari and Rizvi 08 – (*P. R. Chari is a research professor at the Institute for Peace and Conflict Studies in New Delhi and a former member of the Indian Administrative Service. **Hasan Askari Rizvi is an independent political and defense consultant in Pakistan and is currently a visiting professor with the South Asia Program of the School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University. “Making Borders irrelevant in Kashmir” http://www.usip.org/files/resources/sr210.pdf) | + | Chari and Rizvi 08 – (*P. R. Chari is a research professor at the Institute for Peace and Conflict Studies in New Delhi and a former member of the Indian Administrative Service. Hasan Askari Rizvi is an independent political and defense consultant in Pakistan and is currently a visiting professor with the South Asia Program of the School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University. “Making Borders irrelevant in Kashmir” http://www.usip.org/files/resources/sr210.pdf) |
The Kashmir dispute has reached … movement of people and goods. | The Kashmir dispute has reached … movement of people and goods. |